Mumbai High Court hold that the DRT whilst deciding whether it has territorial jurisdiction to entertain a Securitisation Application filed under section 17 of the SARFAESI Act would be guided by the principles enshrined in section 19(1) of the RDDB Act and not by section 16 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, the Court said.
Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/situs-of-the-mortgaged-property-is-not-determinative-of-the-territorial-jurisdiction-of-the-drt-bombay-hc/
Situs of the Mortgaged Property is not determinative of Territorial Jurisdiction of the DRT: Bombay HC | Live Law
Saturday, December 19, 2015
Friday, December 18, 2015
How banks will be impacted in the new lending rate regime
RBI has asked banks to price all new loans sanctioned or renewed from April 2016 based on the Marginal Cost of Funds-based Lending Rate (MCLR). This move sweetens the one proposed in the draft prospectus where the entire loan book of banks was expected to shift to the new mechanism.
What the guidelines mean for a common man is that the change in interest rates made by the central bank will now be based on a scientific method rather than leaving the judgement to the bank management.
How banks will be impacted in the new lending rate regime | Business Standard News
Wednesday, December 16, 2015
RBI is bound to disclose information under the RTI Act: Supreme Court
“RBI is supposed to uphold public interest and not the interest of individual banks. RBI is clearly not in any fiduciary relationship with any bank. RBI has no legal duty to maximize the benefit of any public sector or private sector bank, and thus there is no relationship of ‘trust’ between them. RBI has a statutory duty to uphold the interest of the public at large, the depositors, the country’s economy and the banking sector. Thus, RBI ought to act with transparency and not hide information that might embarrass individual banks.
Read more at: http://www.livelaw.in/breaking-no-fiduciary-relationship-between-rbi-rbi-is-bound-to-disclose-information-under-the-rti-act-supreme-court/
RBI is bound to disclose information under the RTI Act: SC | Live Law
Wednesday, December 2, 2015
Decoding the Indian financial code 2.0 | Business Standard News
Emerging Regulatory Framework for Indian Financial Sector with the emergence of Indian Financial Code.
Decoding the Indian financial code 2.0 | Business Standard News
Decoding the Indian financial code 2.0 | Business Standard News
Tuesday, December 1, 2015
NI Act Ordinance 2015 Retrospective; Dashrath Rathod's Jt have no effect in view of Amendment; SC | Live Law
A Two Judge Bench of the Supreme Court comprising of Justices J.S.Khehar and R.Banumati has held that, in view of the Amended Section 142(2) of Negotiable Instruments (Amendment) Second Ordinance 2015, the place where a cheque is delivered for collection i.e., the branch of the bank of the payee or holder in due course, where the drawee maintains an account, would be the determinative of the place of territorial jurisdiction for filing Complaint under the NI Act. The Bench was hearing an Appeal from an order dated 5.5. 2011 of Madhya Pradesh High Court in which it is held that the Jurisdiction to file a Complaint under NI Act lay only before the Court where-in the original drawee bank was located. The High Court relied on the Three Judge Bench Judgment of the Supreme Court in Dashrath Rupsingh Rathod vs. State of Maharashtra.
“The words “…as if that sub-section had been in force at all material times…” used with reference to Section 142(2), in Section 142A(1) gives retrospectivity to the provision”. The Bench said
NI Act Ordinance 2015 Retrospective; Dashrath Rathod's Jt have no effect in view of Amendment; SC | Live Law
“The words “…as if that sub-section had been in force at all material times…” used with reference to Section 142(2), in Section 142A(1) gives retrospectivity to the provision”. The Bench said
NI Act Ordinance 2015 Retrospective; Dashrath Rathod's Jt have no effect in view of Amendment; SC | Live Law
Friday, November 27, 2015
RBI clears way for 'vulture' funds
VULTURE FUND is an enabling provision for funds scouting for distressed debt.
Globally, there are lots of vulture funds and hedge funds always on the lookout for companies facing a temporary liquidity problem but can honour their obligations after some years, when back in health.
With RBI Green Signal Vulture Funds are back in India.
RBI clears way for 'vulture' funds | Business Standard News
Monday, November 23, 2015
Non-Banking Finance Companies- India
|
1.0
Introduction
NBFCs
are companies that are registered under the Indian Companies Act, 1956, and
doing function akin to that of Banks, with a few differences. It is necessary
that every NBFC should be registered under Sec 45-1A of Reserve Bank of India
Act, 1934. The RBI Act, as amended in 1997, provided a comprehensive
regulatory frame work for NBFCs, particularly Chapter 3-B, 3-C and 5 of the
Act with primary objective of putting in place a comprehensive regulatory and
supervisory frame work, aimed at protecting the interest of depositors as
well as ensuring the sound functioning of NBFCs (Working Group on the issues
& concerns in the NBFC sector ---Report & recommendations –RBI August
2011). The Regulatory Frame work includes:- 1) To issue directions to
companies and its auditors. 2) Prohibit deposit acceptance and alienation of
assets by companies. 3) Initiate action for Winding-Up of companies. 4)
Compulsory registration with RBI for commencement of business. 5) Minimum
entry point norms. 6) Maintenance of a portion of deposits in liquid assets.
7) Creation of reserve fund and transfer of 20% of profit after tax but
before divided annually to the fund. 8)Directions as to:- a) acceptance of
public deposits , b) Prudential norms like capital adequacy , income
recognition, asset classification , provisioning for bad and doubtful assets,
exposure norms and other measures, c) directions to statutory auditors /
BODs/ Shareholders.
NBFC is defined u/s 45-I (f) r/w Sec 45-I (c) of
the RBI Act, 1934. The classifications are based on activity, size and
Liability. Liability based classification: - A Category – NBFC s having public
deposits (NBFCs-D) and B-Category NBFCs not having public deposits (NBFCs –ND).
Activity based classification: - Investment Company (IC); Loan Company (LC),
Asset Finance Company (AFC), Infrastructure Finance Companies (IFC). Size based
classification:-Systematically Important Core Investment Companies
(CIC-ND-SI)-with assets of Rs 100 Cr. and above. The other categories of NBFC
are:-Mutual Benefit Financial Company ( eg:- Nidi Company), Mutual Benefit
Company ( MBC), Miscellaneous Non-Banking Co. ( MNBC)( eg:-Chit Fund Co. ),
NBFC-Micro Finance Institution ( NBFC-MFI).
3.0 Source of Funds for NBFCs
As per RBI Working Group Report August 2011, own funds constitute
25.9% of funds; Debentures constitute 22.2%, Bank borrowings 21%, Commercial
papers 4%, Inter-corporate borrowings 3.1%, Public Deposits 0.5%, and
Others 23.4%. Debentures & Bonds:-In India, the terms ‘Corporate Bonds’ and
‘Debentures ‘are interchangeably used. Though different countries have
different interpretations of both the terms, “Corporate Bonds’ and Debentures’
in Companies Act, 1956, Se. 2(12), identifies both as same. Secured Debentures
are debt instruments and are regulated by SEBI, and do not come under the
definition of ‘Public Deposit’ in terms of NBFC Acceptance of Public Deposits(
Reserve Bank) Directions, 1988.
4.0
Types of NBFCs Multiple NBFCs:
There are many Corporate which have multiple
NBFCs within the group, for eg:- M/s Shriram Group. As such each of these NBFCs
served different purposes; and the reason behind the same are operational
efficiencies, dynastic reason, tax planning e.t.c. The Regulators are, however,
of the opinion that, the multiple NBFCs should not be viewed on a stand-alone
basis, but should be viewed in aggregate. Captive NBFCs: - A captive NBFC is
one where a major portion of its portfolio in receivables is generated by the
sales of products and services of the parent or the group. It functions as an
extension of a corporate marketing activity. In most cases, captives operate as
a core but separate subsidiary of the parent and in some cases as distinct
operating Division. Regulators are of the opinion that a higher cushion of
capital than for normal NBFCs may be warranted for captives. Government NBFCs:
- There are a number of Governmental NBFCs, which fall within the ambit of RBI
Regulations. The Government Department or the Ministry or the Bureau of Public
Enterprises to which such companies are attached, are expected to prescribe the
norm for their operation on healthy lines and monitor their financial health.
Being government companies, they are of no supervisory concern to RBI.
|
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)